organic food or not organic food - that is the question

I read this morning about the article on the daily telegraph, that according to a research organic food is not as healthy as they thought before. Well, I am not sure what the author or researcher think that their vitamins and minerals come from. And I am getting confused myself reading all the studies. One study says that you have everything that you need from your diet, the other says well there is not enough vitamins and minerals in food anyway and now this one says that organic food is not better that the non organic one. Even though some food might be the same, I think when you compare the content of the nutrients of organic food and non organic food, or even the taste of organic food with non organic food, the difference is enormous. First of all if you do not put so many pesticides and preservatives in food, you obviously do not eat them in your food. The second point is that organic foods do have more vitamins and minerals, so you get more, which it might be not much more but it is more, and third of all, the people that do eat organic, know the difference, no matter what the studies says or try to prove. Just to remind the public that many studies will make sure that what ever point they want to make they will make it at their conclusion. And hey there was a study that said that Guinness is very healthy for you!! it has got anti-oxidants, iron and all the good healthy nutrients that you can have, as well as alcohol!!!! I am sure if someone decides to make the point, there will be a study soon that makes cigarettes smoking healthy!!!

Just another reminder that again referring to my other blog about food grown by yourself with no pesticides or a minimum pesticides, will definitely have more nutrient and taste than the ones that are full of chemicals.

http://www.nutritionhealth.net/